Comments for markstar

Comment on Why Robotlegs benefits from AS3-Signals by TK

TK — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:35:17 +0000

I love as3-signals. My only wish is that Flex would incorporate it

Flex is so driven by concrete classes that it’s very difficult to build a strongly-typed, loosely-coupled application with it, but as3-signals fixes the problem elegantly. If only we had generics in AS3…

http://blog.tkassembled.com/83/

Comment on Twitter Search Demo using Robotlegs and Signals by Mark

Mark — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:00 +0000

I would say definitely Robotlegs. There’s so much less boiler-plate code than there is with PureMVC. There’s a couple of quirks, but far less than PureMVC I think.

Comment on Twitter Search Demo using Robotlegs and Signals by James

James — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:04:26 +0000

So the question is; Robotlegs & Signals, or PureMVC?

Comment on Why Robotlegs benefits from AS3-Signals by Twitter Search Demo using Robotlegs and Signals | markstar

Twitter Search Demo using Robotlegs and Signals | markstar — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:22:57 +0000

[...] « Why Robotlegs benefits from AS3-Signals [...]

Comment on Twitter Search Demo using Robotlegs and Events by Why Robotlegs benefits from AS3-Signals | markstar

Why Robotlegs benefits from AS3-Signals | markstar — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:07:16 +0000

[...] of the event model with Robotlegs is that Mediators are tightly coupled with the views. Take my Twitter Search Demo for example, the SearchEntryMediator class expects an instance of the SearchEntry class as its [...]

Comment on Code Formatting for Flex Builder 3 by Valdemar

Valdemar — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:13:32 +0000

Thank you. It is very helpful.

Comment on HYPE ShapeLayout Experiment by Tink

Tink — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:11:52 +0000

Hey Mark, you couldn’t get in touch with me could you please.

cheers

Tink

Comment on HYPE ShapeLayout Experiment by Minimal components: For when you don’t feel like using Flex. | Psyked

Minimal components: For when you don’t feel like using Flex. | Psyked — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:46:43 +0000

[...] wrong with Flex of course, but Mark’s experiments got me thinking about using Bit-101’s MinimalComps [google code] all over again. What are [...]

Comment on HYPE ShapeLayout Experiment by Mark

Mark — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:07:57 +0000

@James Now! The source code has been added to GitHub in my HYPE fork.

Comment on HYPE ShapeLayout Experiment by James

James — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:06:32 +0000

Interesting. So, when do we get to see some code?